Adaptive Agents in Argumentation-Based Negotiation
نویسنده
چکیده
The paper presents a multi-agent system that comprises a society of self-interested agents that use argumentation-based negotiation to reach agreements regarding cooperation and goal satisfaction. The system is a generalization of some argumentation-based multi-agent systems proposed in the literature in which better cooperation agreements are reached through the use of human-like arguments. We then shows how this type of negotiation can be adapted according to evolved models of other agents in the system. Negotiation is performed using different types of arguments varying from quantitative ones, such as money or trade objects, to qualitative arguments, such as promises, appeal to past promises, and past examples. The models of the other agents are built and refined incrementally during negotiation; these models are then used to adapt the negotiation strategy according to other agents' desires, preferences and behavioral characteristics during interactions.
منابع مشابه
A Comparative Study of Argumentation- and Proposal-Based Negotiation
Recently, argumentation-based negotiation has been proposed as an alternative to classical mechanism design. The main advantage of argumentation-based negotiation is that it allows agents to exchange complex justification positions rather than just simple proposals. Its proponents maintain that this property of argumentation protocols can lead to faster and beneficial agreements when used for c...
متن کاملAdvances in Argumentation-Based Negotiation
Argumentation-based negotiation (ABN) is a prevailing approach for automated negotiation. It is based on the exchange of arguments that allow an agent to acquire additional information about the other agents and the particular circumstances of the negotiation, and can be used for attacking or justifying offers. This is an important element in resolving conflicts that very often are due to the a...
متن کاملArgumentation-Based Negotiation? Negotiation-Based Argumentation!
We design a protocol for two autonomous negotiating agents to incorporate Dung-style argumentation into an ongoing bargaining dialogue. Previous approaches considered bargaining and Dung-Style Argumentation as separated components, we show that intertwining these approaches increases the agents scope of action. In our framework the acceptance of an argument or attack uttered by self-interested ...
متن کاملExtending Contract Net Protocol for Arguing Agents
Negotiation is a technique through which two agents having conflicting interests reach an agreement that is beneficial for both of them. Argumentation-based negotiation is a better form of negotiation where one negotiating agent argues with another to justify its position and influences the other agent to follow it. This increases the likelihood and quality of agreement in a negotiation process...
متن کاملBelief Evolution of Intelligent Agent
This paper examines the Argumentation Negotiation of agent as a mechanism for solving the course-scheduling problem. We integrated multi-agent automatic negotiation mechanism and argumentation reasoning to apply in course scheduling problem. We want to evolve the belief of the agents by argumentation-based negotiation, so that agents can have more information of the environment, and select bett...
متن کامل